Analysis Of David s Case, A Gathering Of More Than Six...

The first one In David’s case, there had a gathering of more than six hundred people. It had some problems. The reason is that it could cause some serious distresses to the local people if a gathering in an open place of twenty or more persons (whether or not trespassers) at which the music is played during the night (with or without intermissions) and it is played loudness and duration. (Kate, Mark, Richard, 2015) Sometimes, people will have some social purposes; therefore, the police officers believe that: a) two or more persons prepare to hold there by a gathering; b) ten or more persons need to wait for a gathering and to begin there; c) ten or more persons will attend a gathering which is in progress. There are many persons prepare or†¦show more content†¦And he drunk two beers, but he still was driving because he felt good and confident. And then, on the way home, his car jumped the curb and smashed into a fire hydrant. (Find Law, 2015) Smith was drunk driving obviously, and he would bear his mistake. Finally, he would be imprisoned for six mouths. In fact, it was not related to David because it did not have the direct relationship to David. He need to bear what persons had done in the firm; like the rubbishes which made by persons, the noise which disturbed the neighbour, the property which damaged in the farm and so on. The reason why is that David was the host of the birthday party, he still need to bear these responsibilities though he was not the owner of the land. The second one Why organising a gathering which has no permission of magistrates is a criminal offence? Firstly, what is magistrate? Magistrates and juries have a long history in the legal system; and the personal qualities are most important for magistrates, they should have the sensibility to be aware of the social issues and they need to have a sense of, understand and mature people. (Griffiths, 2015) And then, there are three new offences-----it includes who organise the public assemblies, who take part in public assemblies and who invite another people to attend the public assemblies. (Martin Richard, 1995) In this situation, the police officer could believe that: the gathering would result in a serious disorder; the serious